Re: Re: php feature
| From: | Tijnema ! | Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:46:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: php feature | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-28788@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 4/13/07, Andrew Hutchings <andrew@linuxjedi.co.uk> wrote:
Tijnema ! wrote: On 4/12/07, Oliver Block <lists@block-online.eu> wrote:I think that will screw up some things, for example when using 2 the same scripts, on the same apache, but on different locations. In current ways, the programmer would create a database, and use a separate table for both scripts. But if these "application variables" are there, the programmer would use those, but then script 1 & 2 would both share the same variables, and so that would give a lot of trouble. Especially because a lot people use shared hosting these days, and that means that they all run on the same apache. and so they would share the same "application variables". So if person a & b both install the same script on a different domain. They would work like 1 script, and that just goes wrong. TijnemaYou simply could create a table with 2 columns 'key' and 'value', and so you could easily store both :) I can see where Oliver is coming from, it would be a lot quicker to do it that way. But I can imagine there would be problems making something like that work with all the different types of Apache workers, etc... without some kind of separate daemon handling it. Regards AndrewAm Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 06:34 schrieb Andrew Hutchings:Isn't that what a database is for (e.g. MySQL)?No. - It's that what a symbol table is for.:-) Best Regards, Oliver
-- Andrew Hutchings - Linux Jedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/ Windows is the path to the darkside...Windows leads to Blue Screen. Blue Screen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering...I sense much Windows in you. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php