Re: (ATTENTION) Pre-Beta
| From: | Ilia A. | Date: | Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:49:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: (ATTENTION) Pre-Beta | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-2953@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
The
> date_sunrise() and date_sunset() functions
> [ext/standard/tests/general_functions/sunfuncts.phpt]
test failure was the result of <? being used in the test rather then <?php. A
patch correcting this problem is now in the CVS.
Ilia
On June 28, 2003 04:40 am, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> Source distro ::
>
> http://www.php.net/~sterling/php5/
>
> Win32 binaries ::
>
> http://www.php.net/~edink/php-5.0.0b1-Win32.zip
>
> Download, compile, test.
>
> The following tests should fail on make test for a stock php build::
>
>
> =====================================================================
> FAILED TEST SUMMARY
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Methods via variable name, bug #20120 [tests/classes/bug20120.phpt]
> Bug #22367 (weird zval allocation problem) [tests/lang/bug22367.phpt]
> Bug #23624 (foreach leaves current array key as null)
> [tests/lang/bug23624.phpt]
> aggregating everything [ext/standard/tests/aggregation/aggregate.phpt]
> aggregating all methods
> [ext/standard/tests/aggregation/aggregate_methods.phpt]
> aggregating methods specified in the list
> [ext/standard/tests/aggregation/aggregate_methods_by_list.phpt]
> aggregating methods matching regular expression
> [ext/standard/tests/aggregation/aggregate_methods_by_regexp.phpt]
> date_sunrise() and date_sunset() functions
> [ext/standard/tests/general_functions/sunfuncts.phpt]
> XML parser test, function callbacks [ext/xml/tests/xml001.phpt]
> XML parser test, object tuple callbacks [ext/xml/tests/xml002.phpt]
> XML parser test, xml_set_object callbacks [ext/xml/tests/xml003.phpt]
> ====================================================================
>
> Let me know if something goes terribly wrong on your system. This is
> just meant as a sanity check, not a QA cycle. Ie, if your processor
> doesn't blow up and take at least one arm with it, all is assumed well.
> ;-)
>
> -Sterling
> --
> "Whether you think you can or think you can't -- you are right."
> - Henry Ford