Re: 5 or 6?
| From: | Jani Taskinen | Date: | Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:06:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: 5 or 6? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-30026@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Because it's --program-suffix and not --library-suffix.
--Jani
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 11:29 +0200, Arnold Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why isn't the Apache module appended with the same suffix as the other
> binaries (configuration option --program-suffix). It seems like the
> logical solution here. That way you can have any different versions if
> you want, but the default is just the overwrite.
>
> Best regards,
> Arnold
>
>
>
> Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >> I'd rather not have my old libphp#.so file over-written when I install
> >> a new version, in case things go horribly wrong and I want to just
> >> roll-back...
> >
> > Then you have the same reason to worry right now - every php5 install
> > from 5.0.0 to 5.2.3 overwrites libphp5.so.
> >
> >> There was a time where one could have 2 php mod versions running at
> >> once, as I recall, and having different filenames was kinda important,
> >> eh?
> >
> > Well, there was a setting that kinda allowed that, but I'm not sure it
> > ever worked correctly - there are all sorts of symbol clashes, etc.
> >
> > On the other hand, you can happily run two (or a dozen :) PHP versions
> > right now - just install any FastCGI implementation, compile two
> > cgi-fcgi PHPs and install. Only thing you would need to care about is
> > to give them separate php.ini's and/or separate extension directories.