Re: Question about Namespace patch

Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > working with a large library and have to import a lot of classes, the > > way this works is nothing but a pain. We would be better off not using > > namespaces at all, in this case. Thus, the problem has not been solved. > > Once more, you DO NOT have to import a lot of classes. Please do read > what I write. You SHOULD NOT import classes in global space. Namespaces > are NOT the way to bring all classes in global space, and it should not > be done. OK, so suppose I want to have four namespaces for my project: MyApp for some shared code, MyApp::Model MyApp::Controller MyApp::View Now in many places in my code in Model I'd use some ORM library - let's assume it's similar to python's SQLAlchemy. Now is there any way for me to have access **in Model namespace** to all classes from SQLAlchemy namespace without using import SQLAlchemy::Column import SQLAlchemy::Table import SQLAlchemy::Join import SQLAlchemy::ForeignKey import SQLAlchemy::Session import SQLAlchemy::Transaction and tens of other classes? I know your patch makes it possible to use fully qualified names everywhere. -- Paweł Stradomski