Re: Log4P Project Class Names

Thanks, Marcus. I finally found this documentation on PECL by using Google site:pecl.php.net. I appreciate the insight. On 7/30/07, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote: > > Hello Will, > > > our CODING_STANDARDS says: Classes should be given descriptive > names...Each word should start with a capital letter...without > underscores...The class name should be prefixed with the 'parent set' (e.g. > the name of the extension)). > > > -> Log4PLogger or Log4pLogger > > > marcus > > > Thursday, July 26, 2007, 1:20:46 AM, you wrote: > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > I am continuing my Log4J implementation for PHP. There are some naming > conventions which I am concerned will cause existing userspace class issues. > If you are familiar with Log4J, the following example class names won't be > new to you: > > > > Agent > > Logger > > Appender > > Constants > > FileAppender > > > > And the list goes on. I have attached a text file with all 1.4specifications of log4j. I > considered log4p_* as a prefix for all class > names, but I am concerned for Java developers moving to PHP who are familiar > with the standard already in place. > > > > If you have any insight into this issue, I would appreciate feedback. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Will Fitch > > Zend Certified > Engineer<http://www.zend.com/store/education/certification/authenticate.php?ClientCandidateID=ZEND001989&RegistrationID=211155268> > > > > > > Best regards, > > Marcus > -- Will Fitch Zend Certified Engineer 931.205.8427