Re: Method overloading by method signature

On 17/10/2007, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote: > > suit fully fitted) "catch-up". (Hey when has documentation EVER been > > ahead of the game!?!). > > Always? Otherwise there would be no need for documentation, if > everything was in the code. Some people even start with writing docs and > only then implement the actual code. Of course, it is not always the > case (and some code, like Zend Engine, is so obvious that no docs are > needed anyway ;) but documentation containing more insight and more > content than the pure code is almost always the case, especially with > properly documented code. So all I need to do is document this great new feature, hope no-one notices and then come screaming saying that it doesn't work as documented. Hmm. Possibly not a good way to make friends and influence people. This feature, along with property accessibility via some sort of read/write mechanism would be more useful to me than some other features (like cough-cough unicode cough-cough). It is something I am familiar with in other languages. -- ----- Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"