Re: T_IMPORT vs. T_USE

Are there already any results on these checks? - Sebastian On 10/2/07, Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> wrote: > Of course not (and I know we use import in a few places in ZF) which is why I want to see > whether it makes sense to allow reserved words. The basic parsing rule would be easy but we need to > check how many other areas this might affect. Wouldn't want to introduce any more > inconsistencies. If it ends up being too much of a bother we can just end up using "use". > > Andi > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sebastian Nohn [mailto:sebastian@nohn.net] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 11:16 PM > > To: Andi Gutmans > > Cc: Johannes Schlüter; Sebastian Bergmann; internals@lists.php.net > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE > > > > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Hi Johannes, > > > Our preference would be to stick to "import" because I think the > > perception many will have of "use" is that it also includes files (just > > based on some other languages). That said I agree that compatibility > > would be an issue here. In fact it's even somewhat of an issue with > > "namespace" which is probably also used quite a bit esp. in relation to > > XML. > > > > I don't think people will care much about use vs. import > > perception-wise. But they will care a lot if it breaks their software. > > Just to name two popular products that will break (Johannes can for > > sure > > tell more, he googled for it): Serendipity & Zend Framework. At least > > breaking the latter should not be "your" preference, I hope. > > > > - Sebastian > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >