Re: Re: PHP 5.2.5 Released - update on extensions versioning information
| From: | Antony Dovgal | Date: | Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:55:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP 5.2.5 Released - update on extensions versioning information | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-33086@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 10.11.2007 23:32, Gaetano Giunta wrote:
> Checking dates, pecl 1.2.4 was released the day after php 5.2.4.
As I've already said, OCI8 and PHP releases are not synced.
> I do not need to scan this list's archives to be sure that everybody involved
> in the oci code knew quite well about the pending release of php, and
> changing that single line of oci code where the version is stored would
> not have been a huge deal. If there really was no certainty that the php
> code would end up being the same as pecl 1.2.4, it could have been
> tagged 1.2.4-dev or something like that...
I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Do you mean that all PECL maintainers should update their extensions before PHP release?
> plus a 3 numbered version is very easy to assign to a lib (you know,
> like a new param for a function bumps up the middle number, a fix - any
> fix - bumps up the rightmost one etc... )
That is what $Revision$ CVS tag does, version number is totally different thing IMO.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal