Re: Tainted Mode Decision

From: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:33:40 +0000
Subject: Re: Tainted Mode Decision
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-33347@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Yes, that is exactly the way to go. To quote Yoda (and he would know): "Do, or do not. There is no try.". Or, in contemporary words: do things 100% properly, but if that is not possible, take a step back and spare the world some half arsed attempt.
This makes no sense to me. There is nothing like 100% secure as long as you dont pull the plug on the entire application. The only secure application is one that hasnt been deployed anywhere. So the question boils down to more "does this increase security sufficiently to make the draw backs acceptable".
And the answer is "no" ;) That's my point! Because one of the drawbacks is that it won't cut down the number of dumb ignorants who don't care about that stuff. Why would they, "teh PHP is making things hax0r proof now" after all. David

« previous php.internals (#33347) next »