Re: Will pay for fixes for bugs in PDO/PDO_ODBC

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Wez Furlong wrote: > Your statement is not accurate: > > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/CVSROOT/avail?r1=1.1200&r2=1.1201 > > This should not be a blocker to anyone that wants to take this up. Missed that it was "removed" already. However, having a "restriction" in the first round does make people lose interest in specific bits of extensions - this is also why I am against any sort of restriction of committing on any bit of code inside the PHP core distribution. > Anyhow, if anyone does want to take Travis up on his offer, you'll need the > attached patch. JFYI: Mail.app is broken, please add attachments as attachments instead of "dragging" it in - it splits a normal mail up in two, so I almost missed this part: > PS: More on PDO soon; it has not been forgotten despite sickness, work > and so forth. Things like that happen, but it would have been *much* more proper to bring those things up *before* actually implementing something that many seem to be quite everse against. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org