Re: [PDO] Re: An Idea for PDO 2
| From: | Steph Fox | Date: | Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:04:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PDO] Re: An Idea for PDO 2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals php.pdo |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-35141@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Moin Lukas,
Eh? No, I'm concerned about binaries in the Windows version. We just don't have a working pecl install option. If anyone wants CVS they can use cvs or tortoisecvs or whatever, but that's irrelevant to users...Now, PECL has a couple of CLA'd modules already. I don't like them being there, and you have stated your own opinion loud and clear. I think we should be looking for some way to separate out CLA'd PECL modules to elsewhere but leave the PECL structure in place for those modules. It's important to offer at least that much, because as long as the licensing is sound, CLA'd or not CLA'd doesn't impact end users - just contributors.Well thanks to a separate PEAR channel, we have all the infrastructure easily setup to have a different place for users to pick up the code. Or are you more concerned about the CVS, than the distribution of the packages?
Why copy to PECL in this case? Shouldnt it just be part of the PHP distribution QA process?Nobody liked my original PECLA idea (separate CVS module for CLA'd stuff but all PECL resources shared), so I'm trying to give it a different angle :) I preferred the first version tho'. - Steph