Re: Updated PHP 5 ToDo
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:05:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Updated PHP 5 ToDo | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-3533@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 21:20 20/07/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
Hello Zeev, Sunday, July 20, 2003, 8:09:31 PM, you wrote:Right, and self() is the right choice here (you're referring to the class, not to a particular instance). But that's *if* we decide that we need that kind of syntax in the first place, I'm for one am not convinced... ZeevZS> ? ZS> That's what you have self:: for.- Add support for 'this::<method>()', 'this::<property>'ZS> I see no compelling reason to add 'new this()', but either way, if we do ZS> find such a reason, it will be 'new self()'. Timm already ran into the problem also self and this are of course different things and their meaning should not be changed that would be to much confusion.and 'new this()' inside static methods.