Re: [HOST=] and [PATH=] cgi-only?

From: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:45:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [HOST=] and [PATH=] cgi-only?
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-35490@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 14/02/2008, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stan, > > > On Feb 14, 2008 1:52 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Do I understand correctly that current [HOST=] and [PATH=] functionality > > for PHP works only for CGI/FCGI sapi? Is there any reason for other > > SAPIs not to do it (except for the obvious - lack of implementation :)? > > I know there's .htacess for Apache, etc. but there may be setups that > > might prefer to deal with php.ini... > > > We first discussed about fastcgi as a first step but the goal is to > support this syntax in all SAPI (well, cli makes little sense). It was > thought as a replacement for htscanner (see pecl) but without its > limitation. Whilst having HOST= may not make much sense for CLI, PATH= can be useful. Say you have a live and test websites (either by HOST=test.domain.com or PATH=C:\Sites\Test\Domain\public_html). The live site will have no errors displayed. The test site will have them displayed (maybe). For CLI having C:\Scripts\Live and C:\Scripts\Test is useful as this will provide the same functionality as non CLI. So, if you can please allow PATH= for CLI (rather than just assume it is of no use and ignoring it). I can't think of how I would use HOST= in CLI, unless maybe you could get the machine's name (stretching for an idea here). Thank you. Richard. -- ----- Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"

« previous php.internals (#35490) next »