Re: Role model RFC

On Feb 19, 2008 2:09 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I really like what Stefan did here with his traits RFC. Very solid > work, even if there are still some people not convinced if they want > this feature in, I have seen little complaints about the way this > proposal was made. Quite the contrary actually. I would like this kind > of detailed thought to become more the norm. Even if at the very > beginning of an idea this quality may not be immediately attainable, > it should be the goal. So for every idea we should have at least > someone who tries to bring the proposal to this kind of level as the > discussions progress. > > For this proposal I would hope that it would be put on some host we > can trust to not disappear and be updated with the feedback. I am > still dreaming of a php.net wiki for this kind of stuff. If interested > I do of course offer wiki.pooteeweet.org to host these RFC's for the > time being. Using php.net/reST has the draw back of requiring > cvs.php.net karma for maintenance, which would be problematic for new > comers, unless we can do karma on a per file level for this? I'd certainly be a +1 for a wide-open Wiki on php.net for this and similar activities. It's been mentioned for quite some time, and it seems as though - despite the fact that PHP drives the most popular Wiki software - we're the last to adopt it. In any case, keeping it open means that ALL people involved and with more than just a passing interest can get involved in the C part of the RFC. If it goes through, feel free to count me in as a volunteer to moderate submissions, vandalism, and such. -- </Dan> Daniel P. Brown Senior Unix Geek <? while(1) { $me = $mind--; sleep(86400); } ?>