Re: Trait aliasing syntax suggestions

[snip...] > > class A > { > trait foo; > } > > class B > { > trait foo {unset bing, bar as bing}; > trait bar; > } > ?> > [snip...] As long as we're discussing syntax - I rather like class A { attach foo; } class B { attach foo {hide bing, bar as bing}; attach bar; } but that's just my opinion into the "how to do the syntax" discussion I do like the "foo as bar" style aliasing, it will really make sense as namespaces follow the same convention, but I think hide is more appropriate than unset As for attach keyword, well it's short and descriptive, you are attaching new functionality to the class. I think that reusing trait both as the way to put the trait in the class and to declare the trait will confuse people. My $0.02 Thanks, Elizabeth Smith