RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Replace the flex-based scanner with an re2c [1] based lexer
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:38:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Replace the flex-based scanner with an re2c [1] based lexer | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-35954@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Magnusson [mailto:hannes.magnusson@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:18 AM
> To: Stas Malyshev
> Cc: Antony Dovgal; Marcus Boerger; Andi Gutmans;
> internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Replace the flex-based scanner with an
> re2c [1] based lexer
>
> Improving on that statement: The coolest feature ever is worth
> absolutely nothing unless it is documented.
>
> Don't care if its a new language construct, new class, function or
> method, optional parameter, new syntax in php.ini, errorlevel, dropped
> warnings or an awesome --enable-zend-multibyte configure switch. If it
> isn't documented its totally useless for anyone not reading php-cvs,
> zend-engine-cvs and this list daily.
>
> I'll hunt you all down and make you eat 1kg of vegetables each day
> after the 5.3 release untill proper documentation and upgrade guides
> have been written.
> Mark my words my friends, mark my words! ;)
>
Why do you say it's not documented?
http://www.aconus.com/~oyaji/www/apache_linux_php.htm
http://tinyurl.com/2o8pq2
OK just kidding and I agree it would be nice to have it better
documented in the mainstream docs. As it applies mostly to the Asian
users though (Chinese/Japanese) who usually seek localized docs it's
probably not as good as it should be in php.net.
Andi