Re: Re: [RFC] Namespace syntax decision

Hello Ryan, Saturday, March 22, 2008, 6:50:36 PM, you wrote: > Lars Strojny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am Samstag, den 22.03.2008, 16:29 +0100 schrieb Marcus Boerger: >> [...] >>> looks pretty good to me. Let's see what other responses we get by late >>> wedensday. >> >> I like the current syntax and don't think it is confusing. So -1 for >> changing it. >> >> cu, Lars > I'm also -1 on this one. If your namespace needs to be in brackets {} > then that means more indentation. Not that it's a huge deal but I like > to keep the indents to a minimum. Who forces you to do indentation? Most C++ code that uses namespaces indeed is not indented. And I see not reason it should. If it whould then the namespaces with just a semicolon at the end would need the same indentation. Best regards, Marcus