Re: Re: About that PECL versioning thing
| From: | Christopher Jones | Date: | Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:11:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: About that PECL versioning thing | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-36451@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote:The version number should only change if extension code has been changed. The fact there is a symlink is not really relevent. PHP will have an issue with any extension at PHP release time if the extension code is still marked -dev or -beta. Open question: do we want an extension's version to be the same in its PHP 5.3 and its PHP 6 code base?does anyone have any objection to the proposal at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/peclversioning?The first step in fixing the core<->pecl relationship? \o/ Looks good. But what about extensions that are symlinked to core? Will they need to update their version info during core release cycles?
It obviously shouldn't have a -dev version when distributed with PHP.. Is it up to the RM to hunt those extensions down and make sure the version info is accurate?I'd suggest so. Chris -- Christopher Jones, Oracle Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com Tel: +1 650 506 8630 Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ Free PHP Book: http://tinyurl.com/f8jad Follow me: http://friendfeed.com/ghrd