Re: phar API

Hi everybody, After having a great discussion with Marcus about the Phar API, I've tried to sum up the proposed changes (of course with a strong focus on my opinion about what should be changed :-)). The RFC is not yet finished and I would like you to comment it beforehand. I've tried to include as much as possible as discussed/proposed here. Also I would like to help implementing it (up to the level where my skills end), so this is not (only) about letting others work. A few concrete questions: Marcus, et al, could you please verify that my technical assumptions are correct? Elizabeth, et al, the concrete semantic of Phar::isWritable() is what? Is it just is_writable('test.phar') or is it Phar::canWrite() && is_writable('test.phar')? Benjamin, could you live with the proposed change of the ArrayAccess usage? The RFC: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/streamline-phar-api cu, Lars

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc