Re: Re: The Untouchables
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:25:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: The Untouchables | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-36747@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote:
> > On 01.04.2008 17:00, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >>> So - plain old CVS attic or 'siberia' for the GPL'd ones?
> >>
> >> IMO Attic.
> >
> > Yep, attic should be fine.
>
> I agree with you both (consider it done).
> We'll need siberia for modules that have the potential to live again - these
> two aren't in that category.
Siberia was meant for dead module with no potential to come back to
live. I can't see how these two can live again as they are under GPL,
unless the original authors agree to relicense them.
The unmaintained packages (which can be maintained again, aka back to
live) has be marked as such.
That reminds me that I have to update the RFC according to our discussions :P
Cheers,
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org