Re: spl documentation

> > I think having core module that is documented by doxygen is a shame. And if > there's anybody working on docs, the work should be done first on official > docs in the manual, which right now are in the "virtually non-existent" > state. Doxygen is a nice thing but no replacement for real documentation. > Jesus christ! What's the amplitude this is taking ? We are not talking about keeping SPL ONLY documented in Doxygen, it's simply a nice addition to have it __DOT__. The only thing that Alexey asked was if there was some regenerated docs. Please, if you feel like you still have problems with SPL in the core or any other problems with documentation of extensions because of it's documentation, just start another thread. This one should be long over, the point was just to ask Marcus to put a new generated version online not to start a war on SPL's doxygen's documentation. Thanks, D