Re: Unicode progress [Was: unicode.semantics ad infinitum]
| From: | Lars Strojny | Date: | Tue, 20 May 2008 06:42:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Unicode progress [Was: unicode.semantics ad infinitum] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-37733@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Andi, et. al,
Am Montag, den 19.05.2008, 23:03 -0700 schrieb Andi Gutmans:
> The idea here was to find volunteers who'd try and run their apps and
> some standard apps on this so we can figure out what the migration
> path looks like. That'd also give us the necessary data point to make
> a decision on default for strings. I think none of us right now truly
> knows what to expect.
This might be the time, where we need to think about are more
substantial solution for this problem. What I have in mind is to provide
a system, with the current development versions of PHP (today is would
be 5_2, 5_3 and HEAD) installed. We would liberally grant Shell-Accounts
and DBs to those who are willing to test their web applications there.
Say the S9Y-developers get an account to test their blog system, they
get three Vhosts: s9y.php6.func.php.net, s9y.php53.func.php.net,
s9y.php52.func.php.net. We would continously build CVS snapshots on this
systems to make sure they test against the latest version.
Projects with more resources could run a selenium grid against the
server for their functional tests, the rest would simply test the
applications by hand. We could even install a cruisecontrol (resp.
phpUnderControl) instance to run projects unit tests if the have some.
cu, Lars
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc