static classes (was: Overloading Clarifications)

Hi Lars: On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Lars Strojny wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 09:27:33AM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote: > > > * The new __callStatic() is neat. Thanks. Is there consideration of > > adding Static versions of the other overloading methods? > > It is part of the proposal for real static classes > (http://wiki.php.net/rfc/static-classes) to complete them accordingly > with __setStatic(), __getStatic() and so on. Cool. It would be nice if the __*Static() magic methods could exist in regular classes, not just the proposed static classes. A question regarding this part of your RFC: Static classes may not have a constructor, destructor, dynamic interceptors or __toString() What do you mean by dynamic interceptors? Thanks, --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409