Re: multiple use

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> I find the whole namespace issue complicated enough as it is. >> "importing" multiple namespaces and "aliasing" various >> classess/functions all in one line decreases the readability imo. > > I must say I fail to understand how it's decreasing readability. Is function > foo($a, $b, $c) hard to read? Is array(1, 2, 3) hard to read? Is global $a, > $b, $c hard to read? is implements Foo, Bar, Baz hard to read? Is const $a = > 1, $b = 2 hard to read? What exactly is hard in it? use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo, SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as bar, And::other:namespace as foobar; vs use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo; use SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as bar; use And::other:namespace as foobar; > Almost all structures in PHP that allow multiple elements allow definitions > chained with , - const, var, static, etc. What makes this one so special > that it becomes unreadable one it has comma in it? You are comparing apples and oranges. Do we allow foreach($array as $key => $arrayval as $key2 => $val) ? -Hannes