Re: extensions status, to move to pecl or to drop

From: Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:51:35 +0000
Subject: Re: extensions status, to move to pecl or to drop
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-38193@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 16:31 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote: > * Extension being deleted (not removed, a "cvs rm" will be done) > > mhash, no impact as we provide a compatibility layer via ext/hash > (Thanks to Scott) We should keep this somewhere in Siberia like we did with other extensions we removed. (PHP 4 XML stuff for instance) > * Extension looking for love (if noone raises the hand, they will end > in PECL too) > > - ncurses > I can help here for the windows port and pdcurses support on unix and > windows. Hartmurt agreed for the move it to pecl for 5.3. hm, I thought this was already done, go for it. > - smnp > nice ext, any ISP out there willing to help? I can help for the windows support Last time I checked it worked nicely and I know other user which have no problems either, so I guess there's not much maintenance needed. The only thing I see is implementing new parameter parsing API. So I don't see a reason to move it to PECL. > Can be moved PECL > - interbase > - fpdf > - fbsql > - sybase and sybase_ct Moving fpdf shouldn't be a problem, for the others I can't really judge, I don't know a user of these, but that's me. johannes

« previous php.internals (#38193) next »