Re: extensions status, to move to pecl or to drop
| From: | Johannes Schlüter | Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:51:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: extensions status, to move to pecl or to drop | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-38193@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 16:31 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> * Extension being deleted (not removed, a "cvs rm" will be done)
>
> mhash, no impact as we provide a compatibility layer via ext/hash
> (Thanks to Scott)
We should keep this somewhere in Siberia like we did with other
extensions we removed. (PHP 4 XML stuff for instance)
> * Extension looking for love (if noone raises the hand, they will end
> in PECL too)
>
> - ncurses
> I can help here for the windows port and pdcurses support on unix and
> windows. Hartmurt agreed for the move it to pecl for 5.3.
hm, I thought this was already done, go for it.
> - smnp
> nice ext, any ISP out there willing to help? I can help for the windows support
Last time I checked it worked nicely and I know other user which have no
problems either, so I guess there's not much maintenance needed. The
only thing I see is implementing new parameter parsing API.
So I don't see a reason to move it to PECL.
> Can be moved PECL
> - interbase
> - fpdf
> - fbsql
> - sybase and sybase_ct
Moving fpdf shouldn't be a problem, for the others I can't really judge,
I don't know a user of these, but that's me.
johannes