Re: LSB forward_static_call()
| From: | Stanislav Malyshev | Date: | Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:51:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: LSB forward_static_call() | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-38492@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
So, I really would like to revert that foward_static_call stuff and implement the parent:: patch instead, while it's still possible. thoughts?Didn't we discuss that already? Adding magic to parent:: is not a good idea, it's very basic language construct and should work simple. LSB is an advanced feature, which probably would be used deep inside library guts and thus can use more elaborate syntax. On top of that, by making parent:: forward called class name, you remove the possibility of doing non-forwarding call to the parent class. As for it being slow - how slow it is? Does it really so slow that it makes real-life application that otherwise would be fast to be slow? Or it's just "couple more CPU cycles" slow? I suspect the latter - and thus I don't think speed optimizations belong there. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com