Re: simple solution to another namespace conundrum?
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:36:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: simple solution to another namespace conundrum? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-38579@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Gregory Beaver wrote:
> The user is obviously intentionally creating a "DateTime" class, and
> doesn't care about the internal classname in this script.
>
> The attached patch against PHP_5_3 would fix the issue by eliminating
> the check for conflict with CG(class_table) in the global namespace for
> internal classes. It however preserves this check for userspace classes
> so that (for instance) php-src/tests/Zend/ns_030.phpt does not fail.
> The basic idea is that we do have control over the userspace classes we
> include, but have no control over the internal classes.
I am not so sure this is a good idea. I mean, for the developer that
writes the code it's obvious that his version of DateTime is used. But
for a second developer to come back later this could be a great WTF
factor a few years down the road - wondering why the DateTime
documentation on php.net doesn't match with what the class does.
regards,
Derick