Re: simple solution to another namespace conundrum?

From: Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:36:12 +0000
Subject: Re: simple solution to another namespace conundrum?
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-38579@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Gregory Beaver wrote: > The user is obviously intentionally creating a "DateTime" class, and > doesn't care about the internal classname in this script. > > The attached patch against PHP_5_3 would fix the issue by eliminating > the check for conflict with CG(class_table) in the global namespace for > internal classes. It however preserves this check for userspace classes > so that (for instance) php-src/tests/Zend/ns_030.phpt does not fail. > The basic idea is that we do have control over the userspace classes we > include, but have no control over the internal classes. I am not so sure this is a good idea. I mean, for the developer that writes the code it's obvious that his version of DateTime is used. But for a second developer to come back later this could be a great WTF factor a few years down the road - wondering why the DateTime documentation on php.net doesn't match with what the class does. regards, Derick

« previous php.internals (#38579) next »