[RFC] Namespaces for internal classes
| From: | Lars Strojny | Date: | Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:07:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | [RFC] Namespaces for internal classes | ||
| Groups: | php.internals | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-38730@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello everbody,
one thing on my mind is the current naming of our internal classes. I
could say the same for our functions but no, I don't have plans to save
the universe, saving the world should be enough for now. So I've tried
to dig through the ext/spl-package as an example how to implement
namespaces for internal classes. Also I did it for SPL now, I would go
on further and discuss such changes e.g. for ext/intl.
And here is the resulting
RFC: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaces-for-internal-classes
The RFC is not ready yet but I want to get feedback on it. The integral
part is the list of renamings and that's fixed, so you can expect a bit
more prose :)
Having that for 5.3 seems like a good idea, as we have a) a number of
added SPL classes, b) most likely new extensions introducing new classes
(ext/intl, ext/phar), c) having it is 5.3 would allow us seemless
transistions to newer PHP versions.
cu, Lars
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc