Re: Re: [Fwd: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental]
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:25:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [Fwd: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental] | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.doc php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-39562@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 19:19, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Maciek Sokolewicz <tularis@php.net> wrote:
>> Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we should fix it
>> in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the configure script.
>>
>> Which one will it be? :)
>
> Please use the bug report to reply. If it is a documentation problem,
> then change the category (or anyone who can change it).
I think Jani is right. This should be "discussed" here.
Is the extension experimental or not?
Bundling an experimental extension for 6 years is silly.
Either move it to PECL or mark it as "stable" (or whatever the
opposite of experimental is).
-Hannes