Re: enabling everything by default
| From: | Ilia Alshanetsky | Date: | Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:20:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: enabling everything by default | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-39591@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Perhaps its more of a perception then anything else. If enabled by default simply meant we do so because we can (no external libs needed) rather we think you should have it. There really would be any sort of an issue, and perhaps finally convince people to install what they need rather then delegating the thinking to someone else. Just an idea.
On 2-Aug-08, at 10:05 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 01.08.2008 18:34, Chris Stockton wrote:Ilia AlshanetskyIs their a particular reason you are against giving users such a variety of tools?I'm against enabling untested and unmaintained extensions by default, especially if they are known to cause problems. --Wbr, Antony Dovgal --PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php