Re: Re: 5.3 Backwards Compatibility
| From: | Lester Caine | Date: | Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:18:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: 5.3 Backwards Compatibility | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-40399@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 08:05, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:The NOTES (2005?) I have relating to this do cover the intended plan, but in order to document it one needs to know how it was actually implemented? It's not something I would consider using, but as soon as it appears in libraries one has to understand how it works if one gets dragged in by faults. However if the original plan have been followed, then it's not actually goto is it?Trying to follow on from 'scratchpad' using php.net search namespace - not found - AH - namespaces ...Fixed, but why don't you try to raise this issue on remotely closer mailinglist or bug report?goto not foundHelp appreciated. 'Over my dead body' comes to mind ;)
Greg's blanket - It's in the manual was simply wrong? TESTING new features requires that we know that they are there and how they work? But raising a lot more bugs for things that ARE still being padded out is not the right way of getting the information so we can test? The current problem is that a lot of the material has NOT been pushed back to php.net yet - it still says that is to be done ... so one has to find these extra bits. 5.3.0 has not been released yet, and where data IS in the manual it's marked as 'experimental' ( namespaces ... ) so what is a more appropriate list for matters relating to getting 5.3.0 out of the door in a format that we can actually use? I'm trying to keep a copy of 5.3 running along side my production 5.2 machines in order to test things out, and I have a list of things which need 'fixing' in the applications I am using *IF* I'm to use 5.3 in production, but that can't happen until it leaves 'internals' and becomes a version actually supported on the other lists? For the moment I keep watching here and checking for updates to the information. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.phpClosure - not found"The RFC can serve as documentation until someone can document it" is the new cool today.Don't have time to spend hours finding the information. It takes long enoughHapp shittens. Any and all help is very appreciated.