Re: Re: towards a 5.3 release
| From: | Larry Garfield | Date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:48:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: towards a 5.3 release | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-40423@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 8:22:37 pm Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > I think that PHP is not an OO language and as such there is no reason to
>
> Namespaces is an OO feature, however.
How is the concept of namespaces inherently linked to the use of explicitly
defined classes and instances? Really, I don't understand that. There's
nothing intrinsic in namespaces that doesn't work without classes. Can you
explain to me how namespaces are conceptually dependent on "classic" OOP?
--
Larry Garfield
larry@garfieldtech.com