Re: Namespaced function vs static method in global class

Ionut Gabriel Stan wrote: <snip> > echo Test::foo(); // outputs namespace function > echo '<br>'; > echo ::Test::foo(); // outputs namespace function <snip> > My questions are: > > 1. How should I call the static method foo in the global class Test (except for call_user_func) > 2. How should I call the static method baz of class Bar in namespace Test with call_user_func > 3. Is there no possibility to change your minds and replace the double colon with something > else, likes a simple colon? I find it very confusing to figure out what is what and the way I should > call it. Hi Ionut, Stas did a good job of answering how to call the static method using call_user_func. The answer to #1 under the current implementation is "you can't" which is why I posted a patch to allow differentiating between the two earlier this week. However, I have since discovered a much better solution, and have a working patch, but am checking details offlist before I propose it, as it involves a slight but important change to namespace syntax. Stay tuned for further details. As for your 3rd question, I guarantee this will not happen, as it is technically impossible to do. For instance: switch ($something) { case oops: is:this:part:of:oops(); break; } The above code could resolve to either "case oops:" followed by "is:this:part:of:oops()" or as "case oops:is:this:part:of:oops()" and there is no way for a computer to tell the difference without introducing required whitespace. Since PHP != Python, that won't happen :). Greg