Re: Re: Adding pecl/http to core
| From: | Nathan Nobbe | Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:39:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Adding pecl/http to core | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-40679@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Jani Taskinen <jani.taskinen@sci.fi>wrote:
> Mike R wrote:
>
>> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Wallner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main
>>>>> PHP
>>>>> distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
>>>>> time to ask me and you that question once for all.
>>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>
>> FWIW, ditto.
>>
>> no to insult, but i find the curl api a bit painful. the http extension
>>> is
>>> a lot more api friendly for us oo folks out there.
>>>
>>
> So pecl/http is actually ext/curl with OO API?
for the most part, yes (i know it requires libcurl to build), but it has a
set of functions in the global scope as well, like http_put() and
http_post().
Why not merge the two then..? Or rather, replace ext/curl with pecl/http
> once latter has BC API for us non-oo folks out there..
im not sure the global function set in pecl/http interact w/ each other as
do those in ext/curl. the two sets of functions may be mutually exclusive,
but i suspect there could be some BC breakage in a merge of the two
extensions.
-nathan