Re: namespaces sanity: addition to RFC explaining why Stas's proposal doesn't work

The thread where your vote has to go is: [PHP-DEV] my last attempt at sanity with namespaces started also by Gregory. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Justin Carlson <justin.carlson@gmail.com>wrote: > > I vote for option 3. > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues > > Seems like the best fit all around. > > > > > > Steph Fox wrote: > >> Hannes, Lester... >> >> Can we please start small and then incrementally add more features? >>>>> Lets start with classes only in namespaces in 5.3. >>>>> >>>> >>>> The problem with that statement is that if it is used to ignore the >>>> other >>>> problems, then at some point it may be necessary to re-write all the new >>>> namespace code simply to allow additional features to be added! >>>> >>> >>> tough luck. If it needs total rewrite in the future then it needs >>> total rewrite now to support the additional features anyway. >>> >> >> That was my argument for the entire first half of this week. If either of >> you had looked at Greg's latest idea, you'd know that it removes that >> problem entirely. >> >> Please go and look at his proposals at >> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues, and then vote? >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Steph >> >> >> > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Vesselin Kenashkov developer at www.webstudiobulgaria.com