Re: Resource constants

From: Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:20:16 +0000
Subject: Re: Resource constants
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-41420@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter <johannes@php.net>:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its either being a "supported" feature, or simply put an deprecation notice on it (5.3) and remove it HEAD. I personally vote for the last option, as I don't think resources should be constants as they do not have the constant value even though they do on some level.
I recently discussed the same issue on IRC, (due to #45982) we can't get rid of resources in constants completely as we need that for STDIN, STDOU, STDERR constants.
Yes I know, but still I think we should either making it a supported feature or restrict registering resources on define().
Huh, I wasnt even aware that define() supports anything but scalar values. At any rate I am very sure I never stumbled over code defining a constant with a ressource. Not a very good idea to support ressources, especially given the obvious WTF's this causes (as you rightly pointed out). So I see that an E_DEPRECATED would make sense. However I am not sure about removing this though, which would make the E_DEPRECATED a bit odd (why deprecate if we do not remove?). regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith mls@pooteeweet.org

« previous php.internals (#41420) next »