Re: quick polls for 5.3 (sorry missed a couple votes, but they did not affect the results)

Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > 7) should Output buffering rewrite MFH? this one comes with some > baggage, we need enough people to actually have a look at how things are > in HEAD and make it clear that they will be available for bug fixing and > BC issues resolving. the risk here is obviously that any BC issues will > be hard to isolate for end users. > > -1 Lukas > -1 David > +1 Hannes > +0 Matt Wilson > +0 Greg > +0 Derick > +1 Elizabeth > +0 Lars > -1 Stas for now Need more explanation why we need rewrite, what the > rewrite does, etc. If there's a good reason and maintainer, then maybe +1. > -1 Ilia > +0.5 Steph I'd really like to see it in 5.3 because it was supposed to > fix several OB issues, but it's probably too late in the cycle now > +0 Scott > +1 Kalle > -1 David S.P. for now Need more explanation why we need rewrite, what > the rewrite does, etc. If there's a good reason and maintainer, then > maybe +1. > -1 Rob > +1 Pierre (if it creates non fixable issues during the alpha/RC phases, > it can always be reverted. However the code is much cleaner and easier > to maintain, if I can use the word "easy" for the OB code) > +0 Arnaud Le Blanc > +0 Larry Garfield > +0 Lester Caine > +0 Konstantin Leboev > +1 Jani > +0 Jonathan Bond-Caron > +0 George Antoniadis > +1 Felipe > +1 Moriyoshi > +0 Karsten Dambekalns > +0 Alexey Zakhlestin > +1 Guilherme Blanco > +1 Marcus > > => no MFH, very unclear vote result and nobody that raised their hand to > take responsibility (yes Pierre I know that you raised your hand on IRC) Hm... I'm still alive, but I feel blamed for not reading a mailing list which has become unmanageable to read. I wrote the code, so I'm probably "responsible" for it, too. And again, I was asked several times to back port it, so it can be included in 5.3--which doesn't mean I'm insisting on that matter, just to make it clear. I've still got some email addresses which--despite of spam--I am able to read and respond in a reasonable time span. Usually you can even hit me on IRC. Feel free to ask me any questions per mail or on IRC, but don't expect me to read a quadrillion of mails on internals@. Cheers, Mike