Re: Differences in VC6 and VC9 Windows builds and MSSQL Driver.

Uwe Schindler wrote: > > I am not sure, if VC6 can be dropped easily. E.g. some SAPIs that directly > map into servers may have problems if using the wrong CRT. Until now, I had > no time to build up a Windows "Sun Java System Webserver" and test it with > both CRTs. The code compiles fine on the snaps box, but I am not sure, if > the DLL loads into the server. Precisely. Note that httpd 2.4 (.next) will not be compiled with VC6, but may continue to use msvcrt.dll - if I successfully validate a proper method (which might rely on some sdk/wdk includes) for continuing to use this lowest common denominator crt with sources compiled on modern compilers, I'll be sure to send this feedback in. 99% certain that the classic method is simply wrong (link32 msvcrt.lib /ignore:msvcrXX.lib) since the correct clib headers corresponding to msvcrt are required to avoid abi issues.