Re: [RFC lite] implement import of functions in namespace

On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 13:38 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote: > > It's been a long time for 5.3 already ... let's try to make release > > cycles shorter, not longer! > > There is no pressure on us to push a release. Yes, if we decide to never release it's fine, but if we want to release ever we have to draw the line at some moment. In June or July traits were rejected since we want to release "soon" since then we go from minor delay to minor delay and Lukas and I think it's a good time to finally draw the line. > About removing the closure or anything else only because we want the > beta1 out this month is a bad choice and I strongly disagree with this > decision (if it happens). If we can agree on Christian's last proposal that's better if not I'd say (Lukas agrees) we make sure we have something releasable on which we can build "full closure OO support" lateron without breaking anything. (either making sure the closure implementation is in a state that we can add that stuff lateron without harm or, if nothing else helps, as last step, dropping them) >From time to time we have to make releases and focus on them. johannes