Re: substr passing null...
| From: | Dan | Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:39:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: substr passing null... | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-42870@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>
> You're assumption is wrong then, NULL isn't treated as not passing a
> value. The reason it worked with substr was by pure chance.
>
Out of interest, is there a reason that that is the case? Surely passing
null would be best treated as the same as passing nothing?