Re: 5.3 todos
| From: | Vesselin Kenashkov | Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:31:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: 5.3 todos | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-43007@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
IMHO listing new functions is useful - there could be a name collision with
a function in users code (I know it is improbable, because the functions are
named extname_funcname, but still possible)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Steph Fox <steph@php.net> wrote:
>
> But this was actually an add-on after I put the initial 5.1 upgrading
>> guide
>> together. A 200-line document became a 500-line document overnight, and
>> voila - nobody reads the thing.
>>
>
> Actually I'm wrong - that was 5.2. The 5.1 upgrade guide appears to be
> as-was.
>
> So again, why are we listing new extensions, functions and class constants?
>
>
> - Steph
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
Vesselin Kenashkov
developer at
www.webstudiobulgaria.com