Re: Re: Bug #46701

Please don't even think of backporting. This will definitely break a lot of things, and this kind of thing must not be done in a minor release. Moriyoshi On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org> wrote: > Dmitry, > > Does it make sense to backport 42868 fix to address this issue? > > > On 12-Feb-09, at 3:56 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote: > >> See the results of the following on 5.2.6, 5.2.9rc2 and 5.3: >> >> php -r '$a[1e100] = 1; var_dump($a);' >> >> 5.2.6: >> array(1) { >> [-2147483648]=> >> int(1) >> } >> >> 5.2.9rc2: >> array(1) { >> [-1]=> >> int(1) >> } >> >> 5.3: >> array(1) { >> [2147483647]=> >> int(1) >> } >> >> I doubt the result of 5.2.9rc2 is quite what we expect, and this >> problem should be addressed in 5.3 with the 5.2's behavior unchanged. >> >> Moriyoshi >> >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Moriyoshi Koizumi <mozo@mozo.jp> wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> I guess the patch relies on the 5.3's DVAL_TO_LVAL behavior that was >>> changed by the fix for bug #42868, right? >>> If so, this patch shouldn't be MFH'ed as the #42868 patch was not >>> merged although I didn't remember any discussion on this. >>> >>> See also: >>> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=120799720922202&w=2 >>> >>> Regards, >>> Moriyoshi >>> >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > > Ilia Alshanetsky > > > > >