Re: Re: cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /ext/stan ... Deprecate ticks, pcntl_signal affected?

From: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:00:21 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /ext/stan ... Deprecate ticks, pcntl_signal affected?
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-43160@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:23, James Dempster <letssurf@gmail.com> wrote: > 2008/7/28 Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org> > >> On 26.07.2008 02:48, Markus Fischer wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> [CCing interested parties based on the last mail exchange on this topic] >>> >>> will the deprecation of ticks affect the usage of pcntl_signal? The manual >>> says [1] "... As of PHP 4.3.0 PCNTL uses ticks as the signal handle callback >>> mechanism ...". Current practice requires to "declare(ticks = 1);" for >>> pcntl_signal to work. >>> >>> No ticks, no signal handling? >>> >> >> That's right. >> That's exactly why I don't see how we can deprecate ticks without >> introducing a replacement. >> > What was the outcome of this? http://php.markmail.org/message/qxjxtmm77odcnqhy I think these functions are also documented already. -Hannes

« previous php.internals (#43160) next »