Re: Update to Zend Highlighter

From: Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:45:56 +0000
Subject: Re: Update to Zend Highlighter
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-43597@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Scott 2009/4/2 Scott MacVicar <scottmac@php.net>: > David Coallier wrote: >> 2009/4/2 Kalle Sommer Nielsen <kalle@php.net>: >>> 2009/4/2 Kalle Sommer Nielsen <kalle@php.net>: >>>> Hi Justin >>>> >>> Attached a patch instead, hopefully this will work ;) >>> >>> >> >> >> I really do like this idea :) Let's just commit it. > > Hold your horses, lets not commit things hastily. I'm not a huge fan of > adding 6 new INI settings and I think have another idea so we can avoid > this and still offer more flexibility. Sure 6 new INI settings sounds alot, but thinking about it theres already 6 to control the current (bg, default, comment, html, keyword & string) and 5 of these new ones is to control classes if theres a class naming conflict then a user can customize. So only one setting is needed to enable this feature. But if you have a better way around this then I'm all ears :) > >> >> I would however like ot see the "naming" stucture Justin used in the >> first example by prefixing the CSS classnames by "php". This will >> greatly help the inclusion into other considering that "comment" and >> "default" are widely used (not sure about the other ones) for general >> purposes usage (see google codesearch for example). >> >> Cool work, do we go by adding 6 new ini settings and making sure they >> are prefixed by default? >> >> Also I guess we'll have to attach a css file with that? Inline css at >> the top of the generated highlighted block maybe? >> > > No, the user would be responsible for producing the CSS sheet that they > want. > > Scott > -- Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net

« previous php.internals (#43597) next »