CGI and FastCGI SAPI

From: Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:02:06 +0000
Subject: CGI and FastCGI SAPI
Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-44585@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, I'm trying to understand how difficult it is to create a new SAPI, so I started to poke my nose inside the "cgi" SAPI source code. I saw that "cgi_main.c" implements both the CGI and the FastCGI protocols and I kinda got lost inside all those if-else lines (I tried to take out the FastCGI code and failed miserably). I'm wondering if it's not better to have 2 different SAPIs, one for CGI and for FastCGI. Advantages of this "split" would be: - the source code will be more readable without all those if-else statements - we would have 2 executables that do 2 different jobs, unlike now where php-cgi does both; each executable could then be further optimized for the exact job they are performing Disadvantages I see: - maintaning 2 SAPI implementaion would require more work (since CGI and FastCGI both share most of the SAPI code, any change would have to be replicated twice) - break backward compatibility (where php-cgi handles both CGI and FastCGI) Thank you for your time, Gelu

« previous php.internals (#44585) next »