Re: Missing P in PPP as in package?!

From:	Andi Gutmans	Date:	Sat, 29 Mar 2003 07:36:23 +0000
Subject:	Re: Missing P in PPP as in package?!
References:	1 2 3 4 5 6	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to internals+get-449@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

At 10:29 PM 3/28/2003 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:

Hello, On 03/28/2003 10:57 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
We won't support this. (btw it's the default modifier in Java if you don't write anything else).
I am not defending or suggesting that you support it, I am just asking if you will. BTW, what is the reasoning for supporting private, protected and public, but not package (namespace?!)?

private/protected/public are topics which most people who have used OOP in the past understand well. Package level access tend to be much more confusing and aren't as common. That's why I see a difference. Andi