Re: Type hinting - Request for Discussion
| From: | Alain Williams | Date: | Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:23:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Type hinting - Request for Discussion | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-44904@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:45:55AM -0400, Alban wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I don't understand why you focus on " Strict / Weak " question.
It is really about:
* type checking and enforcement
or
* type casting and generation of an error if the value cannot be converted cleanly
Both of these have a value in different situations ... I would like to see both.
The option of no checking/casting (as at present) should remain.
> For me it's very simple, it's not obligatory use Type Hiting. Developpers
> wants to write a weak code, they'll just have to not use Type Hiting and
> developpers wants wrote a stric code they'll have to use it.
>
> After, choosing use or not Type Hinting when writing a librairy /
> framework, this is not a php.internal problem.
> It's a developper, designer, marketing choice ! Use or not use Type
> hiting can help to chose a user target. And if you want be just between
> weak and strict, " numeric " and " scalar " type hiting seems to be a
> very good middle point.
>
>
> +1 for Strict type hiting. (weak type hiting very similar to no type
> hiting).
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php
Past chairman of UKUUG: http://www.ukuug.org/
#include <std_disclaimer.h>