Re: Re: SOAP_MARSHAL_DATETIME (or: bug #44383)

David Zülke wrote: > On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> I took only a quick look, but I like the patch. >> In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at least into >> HEAD. I agree to commit it into 5.3 too, but RMs take the final decision. >> >> The only thing I didn't understood - why win32/php_stdint.h is needed. > > Ah, yes, that's probably an oversight. Good catch. The headers were > copy-pasted from some ext/date file :) > > Another thing that just occured to me is that we now have a dependency > on ext/date; I think I had trouble compiling ext/soap as a standalone > extension like this. Must check again. Any hints? I think ext/date can't be removed or compiled as shared extension. If it's the case, the only problem may be with unexported symbols. Just try to compile/test it as shared extension on Linux and Windows. Thanks. Dmitry. > - David > >