Re: Regarding constructions like func()[0]
| From: | jvlad | Date: | Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:41:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Regarding constructions like func()[0] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-45986@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Mathieu Suen" <mathieu.suen@easyflirt.com> wrote in message
news:4AF91F92.4000101@easyflirt.com...
>
> Why isn't a mater of pushing the function call statement into a valuable
> statement?
>
> I guess something like this:
>
> statement :
> | value
> | function_call;
>
>
> value :
> | valriable
> | array_access
> | method_send
> | ...;
...
> You also could push the new statement into the value so you can do:
>
> (new A())->foo();
>
> or
>
> foo(new A());
>
> -mthk
How many conflicts does it bring?
For example patch offered in this issue http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50003
brought 5 new conflicts.
Please note that in some cases conflicts will delay calls to zend_compile.c
functions and therefore may bring real problems. IMHO it's not as
simple as populating grammar elements. The results must be carefully tested
to
avoid BC breakage.
just 2c