Re: suggestion about ternary operator
| From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith | Date: | Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:39:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: suggestion about ternary operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-46151@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 21.11.2009, at 22:29, Dante Lorenso wrote:
> I would love to restate my recommendation for the function "filled".
> Which is the opposite of "empty". Filled would accept a variable
> number of arguments and return the first where empty evaluates as
> false.
>
> Like empty, filled would not throw notices for undefined variables.
> This is not the same as the ifsetor debate because filled is opposite
> empty and cares not about isset.
did you even read the RFC?
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
mls@pooteeweet.org